Skip to main content

Solar Rebates & Incentives

Share

Effective direct incentives for solar energy can take a variety of forms depending on the administrative abilities of a given state. Some states have chosen to offer tax credits, others offer up-front rebates administered by state agencies or utilities, and still others offer performance-based incentives that are paid by an agency or utility over time based on kWh production. 

Key Principles for Direct Solar Incentive Programs

  • Set incentives for payback targets - The incentive levels should be set so that solar system owners recoup their system costs over five-years for commercial customers and ten-years for residential customers. With lower installed costs, cheaper financing, and greater tax benefits, commercial systems can be offered lower incentives than residential systems. Incentives can also be tiered by system size. In order to build a significant market, states with very low energy rates or little sunshine sometimes must offer larger incentives than states with high electricity costs and/or plentiful sunshine.
  • Encourage efficient systems design - Where possible, incentives should reward high-performing systems. Direct incentives can be adjusted to encourage systems that maximize peak energy production. A performance-based incentive (PBI) is based on the actual energy production of a system. PBIs inherently incentivize optimal system design and encourage active, ongoing maintenance.
  • Phase out incentives over times - One of the main reasons for enacting solar programs is to jump-start a local solar industry. As the market grows, costs will decline through increased sales volumes and competition. Solar panels are largely commoditized and while declining panel prices reduce the installed costs of solar around the world, developing local installers is still a critical part of building a vibrant solar market. As the installed cost of solar declines, incentives can decline as well.
  • Keep it simple - A certain amount of paperwork and verification is necessary and prudent, but burdening solar customers with a difficult incentive application process or overly prescribing the qualifying conditions can hamper or halt an otherwise effective program.

Topics

Related News

Tuesday, Dec 10, 2019

New York DPS Whitepaper Takes Step Toward the Future of Solar Rate Design

The New York Department of Public Service (DPS) released a long-anticipated whitepaper that proposes rate design changes for residential solar customers in the state.

Read More
Thursday, Dec 05, 2019

Rallying Cry: American Solar Workers Call on Administration to #StopSolarTariffs

Today, dozens of solar energy supporters from across the country gathered at the headquarters of the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) to rally for an end to solar tariffs. Clad in yellow scarves and holding sun balloons, solar workers called on the USITC to grant relief from the harmful solar tariffs.

Read More
Wednesday, Dec 04, 2019

Why the Recent State Elections Are a Positive Development for Solar in the Southeast

The results are in for the 2019 state elections and while both political parties enjoyed victories, one thing is clear—solar energy is poised to grow as several key states voted in officials who support and champion clean energy. There are now tangible, long-term opportunities for continued solar development in states like Mississippi, Virginia, and Kentucky, among many others.

Read More